Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Theological Biology Discoverist

What's a Theological Biology Discoverist? Or a Forensic Creationist? Click here to find out.

Chavez offers aid to US

According to Agence France-Presse (AFP) via Yahoo News,
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez offered to send food and fuel to the United States after the powerful Hurricane Katrina pummeled the US south, ravaging US crude production.

The leftist leader, a frequent critic of the United States and a target himself of US disapproval, said Venezuela could send aid workers with drinking water, food and fuel to US communities hit by the hurricane.

Pat Robertson, who recently suggested he be assassinated, must not be pleased.

Best job to have in the short term

A contributor to TPMCafe believes that a really good job to have right now is a Louisiana bankrupcy lawyer.

Got that right.

Changing from Christianity to Unitarian Universalism

The smijer & Buck blog has a good description of how the author changed from being a Christian to a Unitarian Universalist.

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

10 Point Plan regarding Iraq

Thanks to TalkingPointsMemo for pointing out Juan Cole's Ten Things Congress Could Demand from Bush on Iraq.

I'm not going to try to summarize it - just read it.

Cesca: majority support the Patriot Act

Bob Cesca says that ...
a vast majority of Americans are as comfortable with the Patriot Act as they are certain that the universe was created 5,000 years ago...

When compromise isn't always the solution

Here's an example from BBC News that demonstrates why compromise isn't always the best solution.

Starbucks promoting the h** agenda?

Oh darn ... it looks like Starbucks might be promoting that dangerous homosexual agenda ...

So let me get this straight. If I drink a cup of coffee with a quote about homosexuality printed on it, I might ... become homosexual??

Maybe I can get them to print quotes from gazillionaires on their cups!

Friday, August 26, 2005

Doug Muder: Who's afraid of freedom and tolerance?

In the Fall, 2005 issue of UU World Magazine, Doug Muder asks
Why are fundamentalists so frightened by liberal family values? The reasons, and why we shouldn't just dismiss them.

Death in the Garden

Here's a disturbing story about public heroin usage, from the Boston Herald, complete with 9 photos.

Victory Is

Thanks to Peacebang for pointing out this political animation called Victory Is.

After you watch it, check out Mark Fiori's web site (noted below the animation) for more.

Thursday, August 25, 2005

Massachusetts Quality Affordable Health Care Act

Because my church is a member of the Greater Boston Interfaith Organization, I attended a meeting a few nights ago to learn about the MassACT! Campaign – a ballot initiative in Massachusetts for affordable health care.

If you’re a resident of Massachusetts and are interested in health care reform, they’re looking for your help and the help of members of your congregation.

Below is a summary of the law they’re proposing. If you’d like to help, please call Lisa Vinikoor at 617-275-2807 or contact her via email at vinikoor@massact.org. They're having meetings right now and are planning a signature collecting campaign for September.


Section-by-Section Summary
Massachusetts Quality Affordable Health Care Act
SECTION 1: Policies and Purposes

  • Outlines the current health care crisis.

  • States the Act’s intention to increase access to affordable health insurance coverage for all Massachusetts residents.

SECTION 2: Establishing the Quality Affordable Health Care Program to assist small businesses and moderate income families with health care costs
  • Creates the Massachusetts Quality Affordable Health Care program to assist moderate income families and small businesses with their health care costs. Uninsured individuals below 400% of the poverty line ($38,000 for an individual) will be eligible for the program.

  • Authorizes increased eligibility in the Insurance Partnership, an insurance reimbursement program that helps small businesses provide health coverage.

  • Allows the Executive Office of Health and Human Services to implement a targeted reinsurance program to lower premiums for small businesses and individuals. The reinsurance pool would cover individuals with catastrophic medical costs, allowing insurers to cut premiums.

  • Authorizes sliding-scale premium reductions or tax credits for middle income households up to 400% of the federal poverty level.

SECTION 3: Affordable Health Care Fund
  • Establishes the Affordable Health Care Fund, which will be used to finance the Massachusetts Quality Affordable Health Care program and the expansion of MassHealth eligibility and benefits.  

  • The Fund will consist of revenues from the increased cigarette tax, the assessments on businesses that do not provide health coverage to their employees, and federal reimbursements.

SECTION 4: Expanding coverage for low income working adults and children
  • Authorizes MassHealth to cover all adults up to 200% of the federal poverty level ($19,000 for an individual) and children under the age of 21 up to 300% of the federal poverty level ($58,000 for a family of 4).

SECTION 5: Lowering health care premiums by repealing the Uncompensated Care Surcharge paid by insurers and other health care purchasers
  • Repeals the $160 million Uncompensated Care Surcharge now paid by insurers and employers who purchase health coverage for their employees.  

SECTION 6: Lowering health care costs by reducing the Uncompensated Care Surcharge paid by hospitals [not included in versions C and D]
  • Limits the hospital sector’s Uncompensated Care Surcharge to $80,000,000, which is half of its current level.

SECTION 7: Cigarette tax earmarked to fund affordable health care programs
  • Raises the cigarette tax 60 cents per pack, to $2.11.

  • All revenues will be deposited into the Affordable Health Care Fund.

SECTION 8: Affordable Health Care Fair Share Assessments
  • Creates an Affordable Health Care Fair Share assessment to ensure that all employers are contributing to their employees’ health care costs.

  • For employers with more than 100 workers, the assessment is 7 per cent of their adjusted payroll.

  • For employers with 100 or fewer workers, the assessment is 5 per cent of their adjusted payroll.

  • The first $50,000 of an employer’s annual payroll is not assessed.

  • Money that employers already spend on health insurance benefits for employees will be considered a credit against this assessment.  Thus companies covering their workers will not pay the assessment.

  • The regulations enforcing these provisions will include exemptions for substantial hardship.

  • Revenues will be deposited into the Affordable Health Care Fund.
     
SECTION 9: Restoring MassHealth benefits and eligibility

  • Restores benefits which were in effect in January 2002, including:

  • dental services and dentures

  • eyeglasses

  • Adds smoking and tobacco use cessation treatment and information to the MassHealth benefit package

  • All residents who are lawfully residing in the United States are eligible for benefits on the same terms as citizens.

SECTION 10: MassHealth payment rates shall cover costs [not included in versions B and D]
  • Directs MassHealth to pay hospitals, community health centers and physicians their costs for serving MassHealth recipients.

  • Directs MassHealth to use the Medicare payment system in reimbursing hospitals and physicians.

SECTION 11: Severability
  • Declares that if any section of this law or an application of it is deemed invalid, the invalidation will only affect that specific section.  

SECTION 12: Effective Dates
  • The cigarette tax increase takes effect on January 1, 2007.

  • The employer assessments take effect on July 1, 2007.

  • The MassHealth payment reforms take effect on October 1, 2007.

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Sinkford Supports NCC'S Response to Pat Robertson

Unitarian Universalist Association president Bill Sinkford Supports NCC'S Response to Pat Robertson's Call for Assassination of Venezuelan President ...
"I join with National Council of Churches in Christ General Secretary, the Rev. Bob Edgar, in rejecting the Rev. Pat Robertson's suggestion that the U.S. should execute President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela. As a religious leader, as a person of faith, and as an American I must reject any kind of religious fundamentalism that condones violence, whether it comes from terrorists abroad or prominent Christian leaders here at home. I hope my colleagues in faith and in this country will do the same." William G. Sinkford President Unitarian Universalist Association

Talk Show Host Fired Over Islam Remarks

The Washington Post reports that ...
Washington radio station WMAL-AM fired talk show host Michael Graham yesterday [August 22] after he refused to soften his description of Islam as "a terrorist organization" on the air last month. ...

According to WMAL, Graham said "Islam is a terrorist organization" 23 times on his July 25 program. On the same show, he also said repeatedly that "moderate Muslims are those who only want to kill Jews" and that "the problem is not extremism. The problem is Islam." ...

Graham said he was outraged that free speech and open discourse were being abandoned on a talk show.

Finally a station takes some responsibility.

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

Robertson Calls for Chavez' Death

The Associated Press via iWon says ...
Religious broadcaster Pat Robertson suggested on-air that American operatives assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez to stop his country from becoming "a launching pad for communist infiltration and Muslim extremism."

"We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability," Robertson said Monday on the Christian Broadcast Network's "The 700 Club."

"We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator," he continued. "It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with."

Way to go, Pat. Advocating murder. That's a Christian message ... how?

Saturday, August 20, 2005

Theory of Intelligent Falling replaces Gravity

The Onion, in its inimitable style, says ...
As the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools continues, a new controversy over the science curriculum arose Monday in this embattled Midwestern state [Kansas]. Scientists from the Evangelical Center For Faith-Based Reasoning are now asserting that the long-held "theory of gravity" is flawed, and they have responded to it with a new theory of Intelligent Falling.

"Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University. ...

Preaching the positive

Church Maketing Sucks reminds us that a positive approach is better than a negative approach ...
...there's a line that needs to be drawn when hard questions turn into venomous outbreaks against other segments of the church. I can't count the number of times I've sat in church and listened to the pastor tell me how wrong "denomination x" is and how their erroneous theology is going to lead them all to hell in a hand basket. ...
Although this blog is oriented toward Christian churches, ministers of every faith should take heed.

Friday, August 19, 2005

Fast Company: Why We Hate HR

In the completely off topic arena, Fast Company says that, for the average company, the Human Resources department has nowhere to go but up.
In a knowledge economy, companies with the best talent win. And finding, nurturing, and developing that talent should be one of the most important tasks in a corporation. So why does human resources do such a bad job -- and how can we fix it?

Thursday, August 18, 2005

Muslim moderates

Jeff Jacoby in the Boston Globe says ...
For years, Muslims have been criticized for their seeming complacency about Islamic terrorism. Time and again, Islamist radicals have committed some savagery, and time and again non-Muslims have wondered why there was no outcry of condemnation from the Islamic world. Let a fictional TV show depict Muslims unflatteringly, and Muslim spokesmen thunder in outrage. Where is that outrage when real atrocities are being carried out by killers professing Islam?

Good news: Since 9/11 a growing number of Muslim moderates have been speaking out. They have denounced the jihadis' ideology as a perversion of Islam and a disgrace to Muslims everywhere. More important, they have emphasized that decent Muslims have an obligation to enlist in the war on terror -- not merely to denounce the fanatics from afar, but to delegitimize and defeat them at home. ...

He goes on to discuss the recent "fatwah" against terrorisn saying that, because of the real actions of some who signed it, it was merely a stunt.

ACLU Freedom Files

The American Civil Liberties Union has a new television series called ACLU Freedom Files.

How to support the troops

Danny Schechter asks, What's the best way to "Support the Troops"?.

James Moore: Proud Left-Wing Liberal

James Moore says, in part ...
Liberals are people who believe, like Jefferson, that our country and our culture are best judged by how we treat the least of our citizens. They believe in a tax code that is progressive enough to help families and puts a greater share of responsibility for funding government on the corporations that are making huge profits. Liberals prefer to spend money on programs that give the disadvantaged a chance in America instead of buying and building tanks and guns that are outdated in the war on terrorism. We want a strong defense but demand accountability from the Pentagon and defense contractors. ...

Birthright UUs vs converts

Transient and Permanent has a posting called Birthright UU: Triumphalism and Discrimination Among Non-Converts?.
For many years, I've maintained that there are differences between those who were raised UU and those who converted to UUism as adults. For one thing, converts often (but far from universally) suffer from Angry Ex-Christian Syndrome, which in its related Diehard Secular Humanist manifestation is blamed by many for making UU churches uncomfortable places for theists, Neo-Pagans, and other types of UUs. It also seems to me that converts have lots of issues that just aren't as pressing for people who grew up UU, such as anxiety over whether UUism is a religion, what our core beliefs or values are, concern about our roots as a Christian tradition, etc. In interacting with other people who grew up as Unitarian-Universalists, I've often felt a common recognition of shared understanding of what it is to be UU that is essentially experiential and nonverbal. There also tends to be an easier acceptance of the fluidity of personal and communal religious belief/practice and a predeliction for reconciling different religious ideas or even holding them in creative tension among many lifelong UUs. Many other possible trends that distinguish converts and non-converts might be proposed. ...
The writer apparently doesn't like the term "birthright UU" .. "What is this 'right' which is being asserted?".

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

Christian Alliance for Progress email

Here's an email I got from the Christian Alliance for Progress ...
A few weeks back, I requested your help with an important issue. I asked you to speak out against Jerry Falwell’s claim that the Christian Alliance for Progress is “Hardly Christian”, and you did. We received nearly 1,000 letters from across the country. To those of you who wrote, thank you. Your responses affirm that Falwell and other leaders of the Religious Right can not speak for all Christians.

Now I ask you for your help on another issue. We need to guard against the ever increasing threat of the Christian Right continuing to erode America’s separation of church and state.

This past Sunday in a church in Nashville, the Christian Right held Justice Sunday II. James Dobson of Focus on the Family, Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Phyllis Schlafly of the Eagle Forum and many other leading figures of the Radical Right joined House Majority Leader, Tom DeLay in a live broadcast sent via satellite to thousands of churches nationwide. The original Justice Sunday a few months ago in April included speeches from political figures like Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist. Then, as now, the event was draped in Christianity and called for the nomination and approval of very conservative - even ultra conservative judges for our courts.

Indeed, the Religious Right is blurring the lines of church and state, using a place of worship to stage a political rally headlined by one of the most powerful office holders in the country – one who has publicly called for integrating the Right’s version of Christianity into our government.

Separation of church and state has been a fundamental American value that both protects us from the government imposing a particular religion while also guaranteeing our freedom from that government in our place of worship. The Christian Right seeks to institutionalize and impose their beliefs on all Americans when our country’s political and religious traditions honor precisely the opposite values.

At the Christian Alliance for Progress, we affirm America’s well established commitment to a clear separation of church and state. We need to make our voices heard. Please take a moment to send a letter to your Senators expressing your personal commitment to a separation of church and state. Take action now.

The Christian Alliance for Progress participated on Sunday in Nashville with other local and national organizations in a counter event. We stood in opposition to the extremist message of Justice Sunday II. Click Here to read my remarks from the “Freedom & Faith” Event.

Your personal participation in this movement matters. Christian Alliance for Progress is the place where your voice can be heard. Thank you for your passion and commitment.

Sincerely, Patrick Mrotek

Saturday, August 13, 2005

Unitarian Universalism, The Next World Religion

Doug Rogers of the Mission Peak Unitarian Universalist Congregation dropped me a note pointing me to a sermon he delivered at his church recently. Absolutely worth reading in its entirety, but here's a few concluding paragraphs ...
We have all the elements of a great religion, one that could bridge the gap between modern science and ancient wisdom. One that really could bring peace to the nations and peace in our hearts. We have both a clergy and a membership who, together, comprise an expertise in both science and religion that is unmatched. We have a culture of open discussion, and we also are willing to change and have changed our service format, music and words. We could be the force that reinterprets spirituality in our time.

We lack organization. We are stuck in the worst possible model - every church for itself, but with a centrally educated clergy and a weak national association dominated by a professional staff (although that part is changing). We don't know what our message is, we are unable to separate important issues from distractions, and we have the foolish idea that every individual has the right to pull the organization in his or her particular direction. Sometimes I wonder that we exist at all.

It's ironic that we are quite clear on advising individuals on how to organize their individual lives, how deal with grief or loss, how to prioritize and move forward, but we have not yet figured out that the same issues and problems exist at an institutional level. As an institution, we need to do the work that a weakly functional individual does when he or she sees a professional; that is to review, refocus and move forward with purpose.

Sinkford joins challenge of upcoming "Justice Sunday II"

(Boston, August 12, 2005) The Rev. William G. Sinkford, UUA [Unitarian Universalist Association] President, joined other progressive religious leaders in a teleconference yesterday which challenged the focus of the upcoming "Justice Sunday II" event. The teleconference, which was covered by 35 reporters and news organizations, included Sinkford, the Rev. C. Welton Gaddy (President, The Interfaith Alliance ), Rabbi David Saperstein (Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism ), the Rev. Dr. Robert Edgar (General Secretary, National Council of Churches USA ), and Ms. Mirin Kaul Phool (President, Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund ).

Teleconference speakers addressed the Religious Right's plans for "Justice Sunday II," an evangelical event subtitled "God Save the United States and this Honorable Court" which will be held in Nashville on August 14th. The progressive religious leaders offered a different religious perspective on the nomination and addressed the role of faith in politics.

In his statement Sinkford said, "We are concerned that the events planned by conservative groups in Nashville will continue to falsely claim to represent the only faithful perspective on the Roberts nomination. We affirm the right of any group to express its position on the issues of the day, but we will not remain silent when any group falsely claims to speak for all people of faith. There is no one "religious" position on the Roberts nomination, no one religious view on the future of the Court or the cases it will hear." The complete text of Sinkford's statement can be found at http://www.uua.org/news/2005/050812_justice_sinkford.html.

The complete story on the teleconference, plus UUA commentary and grass roots resources, can be found at http://www.uua.org/news/2005/050812_justice.html. Deborah J. Weiner Director of Electronic Communication Unitarian Universalist Association 25 Beacon Street Boston, MA 02108 617-948-6104 617-742-7025 (FAX)

Wednesday, August 10, 2005

Meet the original power couple

who happen to be permanent residents of my church ...

Conservative org withdraws support for Roberts

A conservative organization called Public Advocate of the United States is withdrawing support for Judge John Roberts' nomination to the Supreme Court.
The move comes as a result of Roberts' support for the radical homosexual lobby in the 1996 Supreme Court case Romer v. Evans, which overturned a pro-family law passed by the citizens of Colorado in an appalling act of judicial activism.
Because I confuse easily, I checked Wikipedia for a definition of "radical homosexual lobby" and couldn't find one. I'll keep checking and let you know when I find out where the RHL is located.

ADL To Falwell: Retract Call To 'Vote Christian'

From the Anti-Defamation League :
New York, NY, August 8, 2005 … The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) strongly criticized the recent appeal by Reverend Jerry Falwell for his constituency to "vote Christian in 2008" and urged him to retract his "divisive and un-American" call to action.

In a mass fund-raising letter, Reverend Falwell wrote that he sought "to utilize the momentum of the sweeping conservative mandate of the November 2, 2004, elections to maintain a faith and values 'revolution' of voters who will continue to go to the polls to 'vote Christian' and call America back to God." Falwell included in his letter to supporters a car sticker that reads, "I Vote Christian."

"Reverend Falwell's recent statements are directly at odds with the American ideal and should be rejected," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director. "Understanding the danger of combining religion and politics, our Founding Fathers wisely created a political system based on individual merit and religious inclusiveness."

Mr. Foxman said that Rev. Falwell "should retract his divisive and un-American call to action. Appeals to voters should not be on the basis of religion, nor should a candidate's religious beliefs be a litmus test for public office."

The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913, is the world's leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

United American Committee

Introducing the United American Committee. They're extremely against Islamic extremism in the United States.
We are Caucasians, African-Americans, Hispanics, YOU! All Americans, striving for a better tomorrow in America. A tomorrow where our children may be free, free from Islamic extremist threats at home.
Nobody wants Islamic extremist terrorism, of course, but why do these people seem a little scary?

Monday, August 08, 2005

Dems: Come to the loading docks

Fred Stembottom pens an essay about Democrats from the point of view of a blue-collar worker.
I have been reading pages and pages about the DNC and the DLC and I want to tell you why I am so opposed to the direction the DLC has taken the Party in the last 20 years.

I have been advocating, writing letters, talking locally within the Democratic Party for 25 frickin' years now. To no avail.

My message is simple: talk about workers' rights. Unionizing, outsourcing (especially outsourcing!), management cheating (we have ALL been cheated out of portions of our wages by innumerable statistical tricks). SPEAK OF THEM and blue-collar men go absolutely NUTS with recognition of the problems! Followed 5 minutes later with the most intense hunger to do something about it all that you have ever witnessed. ...

What "can" you believe as a Unitarian Universalist?

The Transient and Permanent blog has a good discussion called The Impossibilty of Believing Whatever You Want.
There's a mighty big myth about Unitarian-Universalism that has been circulating for years. It's the idea that in UUism "you can believe whatever you want." That's not how I understand it at all. Truthfully, in UUism "you have to believe what you really do believe, whether you want to or not." Followed authentically (dare I say "religiously"?), this is potentially a far harder, more spiritually refining course than creedal religion. UUism isn't for slackers. ...

National Council of Bible Curriculum in Public Schools

smiher & Buck has a good discussion of the controversy over religious scholar Mark Chance's analysis of the National Council of Bible Curriculum in Public Schools. The analysis was sponsored by the Texas Freedom Network.

Friday, August 05, 2005

Just 10 commandments in public aren't enough for some

According to the Salt Lake Tribune ...
Followers of the Summum faith say Moses made two trips down from the mountain. On one journey, the prophet returned with the Ten Commandments, "lower laws" that were easily understood and widely distributed.

The higher law obtained from the other trip, though, was passed down only to a select few who were able to appreciate it, according to the Salt Lake City-based religion.

But now, Summum is fighting a legal battle to share that higher law - the Seven Aphorisms, or principles that underlie creation and nature - with everyone in a public forum. The church has filed suit against Pleasant Grove over its refusal to allow it to erect its own monument in a city park that has held a Ten Commandments monolith since 1971. ...

New Thought Church

An article in Beliefnet by Nancy Colasurdo discusses her move from Catholicism to a "New Thought Church". I had a bit of a problem identifying a web site for them, but this one seems to be one that's relevent. Apparently its some sort of organization that encompasses 10 denominations (none of which I remember ever hearing of). The ones in Massachusetts, at least, seems to be Unity Churches.

Teaching the alternatives?

Logos has a good cartoon about the viability of teaching alternative "theories" about things (like Intelligent Design vs Evolution). In words, it compares
  • Alchemy vs Chemistry
  • Phrenology vs Neurology
  • Magic vs Physics
  • Astrology vs Astronomy
That's the logical conclusion one has to come to, of course, if Intelligent Design is to be included in a curriculum. We also need to teach Alchemy, Phrenology, Magic, and Astrology in our schools in order for students to get a "balanced" approach.

Thursday, August 04, 2005

Jim Wallis: Democrats need to define message

Jim Wallis, editor of Sojourners Magazine and author of God's Politics says, in a New York Times op-ed piece, that it's more important for Democrats to define their message than figure out how to reframe it. His suggestions:
  • Lead on the issue of poverty
  • Speak of the environment as a religious concern
  • Win back "values voters" only with fresh ideas
  • Become the truly pro-family party by supporting parents in doing the most important and difficult job in America: raising children
  • Argue that the safety of the United States depends on the credibility of its international leadership

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

Binladenism

Abdul Cader Asmal, former president of the Islamic Center of Boston and former president of the Islamic Council of New England, writes in The Boston Globe ..
... Ironically, it is us Muslims who have the greatest vested interest in eradicating terrorism. We need to do this to salvage our religion and our self-respect. As long as we are marginalized by the West and taunted by the extremists, we are made to feel as if we were part of the problem rather than of the solution, and our commitment becomes ambivalent. If the so-called war on terrorism has any chance of being won, there needs to be an immediate redefinition of the enemy.

First, to achieve a delinkage between Islam and terrorism, the term ''Binladenism" has been suggested. It is an accurate characterization of the architect whose unifying call is hate, whose target is the current world order, whose modus operandi is the terrorization of innocent civilians, and whose fascist ideology directly contravenes the basic principles of the religion it claims to espouse. ...

Global War On Terror renamed

According to the International Herald Tribune and other sources, the Global War On Terror has a new moniker.
The Bush administration is retooling its slogan for the fight against Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups, pushing the idea that the long-term struggle is as much an ideological battle as a military mission, according to senior administration and military officials.

In recent speeches and news conferences, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and the country's top military officer have spoken of "a global struggle against violent extremism" rather than "the global war on terror," which had been the catchphrase of choice.

It took them how long to realize that you can't have a war against being afraid or causing people to be afraid?

A letter to Hillary

Dan Carol writes a letter to Hillary - "the presumptive 2008 Democratic nominee and like it or not, you are a permanent LIBERAL ICON" - with some suggestions.
...stop trying to figure out how to be in the middle of the old political spectrum, and instead consider becoming an uncompromising vanguard for defining dynamic change in the post-DLC era. Re-read David Sirota’s Da Vinci code, the latest in a long line of useful clarion calls from Jim Hightower and others for a new grassroots politics of passion that actually wins in red states. Remember the unlikely political success of a Paul Wellstone, or a Ronald Reagan and even a Ross Perot who was after all, key to your husband’s 1992 election. And should you choose to embrace and define the emerging parameters of a "new middle," you will no doubt find some really strange bedfellows waiting there, like your new health care buddy Newt Gingrich (I loved that one by the way). ...

Only wanting God sometimes

Laurel Snyder has a good commentary on only wanting God around when planning a major life event ceremony like a wedding.
You should figure it out before you order the invitations, because if you're trying to pull off a pretend covenant before God -- if you think he won't notice that you're lying, reading your prayers from a cheat sheet, renting a church you've never set foot it to fake out Grandma -- you've picked the wrong man to fool. No matter how pretty you look in your Vera Wang.

Tuesday, August 02, 2005

Bush endorses Intelligent Design

According to The Seattle Times,
President Bush waded into the debate over evolution and "intelligent design" yesterday [August 1], saying schools should teach both on the origins and complexity of life.

In a wide-ranging question-and-answer session with a small group of reporters, Bush essentially endorsed efforts by Christian conservatives to give intelligent design equal standing with evolution in the nation's schools. ...

Why am I not surprised? (sigh)

Moral relativism

Doug Muder over at Free and Responsible Search makes a good case for being a moral relativist.

Monday, August 01, 2005

Altar Boyz

Saw a great off-Broadway show in New York this past weekend ... Altar Boyz. It's about a fictionalized Christian boy band (Catholic, actually) from Ohio which is presenting its last New York show on the stage. The "names" of the members of the band are Matthew, Mark, Luke, Juan, and Abraham ("he's Jewish!").

Very funny, great music, and not in the least sacrilegious - at least to me.

Bolton to be U.N. Ambassador

So President Bush is going to name John Bolton to be U.N. Ambassador while the Senate is on vacation.

Whatever happened to the "We demand a vote!" on presidential appointments? Oh, sorry. That's only if the Republicans want a vote.

">